Make Facebook look like a steam engine. Bruce Sterling talking about the human sensorium, enough hype and putting AR in light bulbs.
Jees, this guy is annoying to listen to, says the only comment. It got upvoted twice. Bruce Sterling – excuse me i mean the prophet of AR – is talking at Augmented World Expo 2016 on YouTube. I came here two years later because of a lengthy footnote that Benjamin Bratton put in The Stack.
The GUI melts into reality itself
I am deep down in the Interface Layer section, having left out the other Layers, in order to find out more about Brattons take on AR. And here we go, pg. 241: „Put another way, AR Apps, in all their baroque banality, augment the world more than they augment vision. As we define the interface as any point of contact that governs the conditions of exchange between two complex systems, then within AR, the GUI melts, so it seems, into reality itself, and is seen as another property of surfaces, things, and events….the real is itself collapsed into the imaginary, making the reality of AR perhaps irredeemably occult.“
Not yet sure what to think about Brattons idea that ARs killer application „would prove to be not marketing but those fundamentalist religion and politics (as well as security Apps and their monetizations)“. That might sound alarmist but we all have seen the chinese police woman a couple of days ago and these worshippers today. These make Sterling sound a lot less crazy in 2009: Soon we’ll have some themepark Creationist Augmented Reality.
Attack and Defend – or Shop
Interpreting Ingress as some sort of training camp for future scenarios in the context of a „weaponized AR“ is ingenious: „to send people out into their cities training them to see, attack, and defend against the territorial incursions of enemies.“
Besides AR warfare training or a Christianist AR „any given site in the City may be overcome by multiple competing perceptual totalities, systems or souvereign geographies“ and „the User must manage more than one exclusive totality at once, and the multiple identities and agencies that each regime provides to the user position.“
GUI, NUI, TUI, MUI
Well. I have the impression that we are already experiencing something similar when walking down the city center with all the commercials crying out loud for attention while the mobile phone rings and we do have to act as employer, friend or someone else. But all this might change when „a fully mature interface regime“ (pg. 226) finally arrives.
Vision Driven Design Research
* Radical Atoms is the future material that can transform their shape, conform to constraints, and inform the users of their affordances. Radical Atoms is a vision for the future of human-material interaction, in which all digital information has a physical manifestation so that we can interact directly with it. We no longer think of designing the interface, but rather of the interface itself as material. We may call it “Material User Interface (MUI). And: From the three approaches in design research: technology-driven, needs-driven, and vision-driven, we focus on the vision-driven approach due to its lifespan. Sounds like a useful idea. Next video on the list.
** Design Fiction is a design practice aiming at exploring and criticising possible futures by creating speculative, and often provocative, scenarios narrated through designed artifacts. It is a way to facilitate and foster debates, as explained by futurist Scott Smith: „… design fiction as a communication and social object creates interactions and dialogues around futures that were missing before. It helps make it real enough for people that you can have a meaningful conversation with“. By inspiring new imaginaries about the future, Design Fiction moves forward innovation perspectives, as conveyed by author Bruce Sterling’s own definition: „Design Fiction the deliberate use of diegetic prototypes to suspend disbelief about change“. Randomly related: Global Futures Lab.